Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Faizan S.'s avatar

This is a great initiative Ethan, I'd love for you to deep dive on the following (if possible):

"One has to learn the history of a system to confidently say that blockchains (or unified ledgers) is a true net positive improvement to the system."

Given your experiences and interactions, it would be great to learn more about how current systems can be positively impacted via crypto.

Expand full comment
Zach Wong's avatar

This is a great post. What made me fall down the rabbit hole was the interdisciplinary nature of crypto -- for one, the tech is inherently political or philosophical; and second, as one of just a few genuinely 0 to 1 industries that is also very iconoclastic, you get to see how tech, business, politics, and notions of philosophy/justice/desert intertwine to produce progress or stagnation (e.g., many feel that stablecoins *should* be embraced because payments incumbents *don't deserve* their privileged position... payments *shouldn't* take 3 days to settle cross-border... these are normative arguments, not technical, business, or political arguments).

I came from politics, philosophy, and I've been diving deeper into the tech and infra for the past four years. I'll cross the mid curve the other way :)

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts